Con Air 2010 (TSA Remix) Cameron Poe is back, and he’s getting an enhanced pat down (just like you). This holiday travel season, we’re all convicts. Approximately 30 seconds. “Con Air 2010 (TSA Remix)” is written and produced by Ted Balaker. Related video: Coming Soon to an Airport Near You: Prison-style strip searches? www.youtube.com Visit Reason.tv for HD, iPod, and audio versions of this and all our videos and subscribe to Reason.tv’s YouTube channel to receive automatic notification when new content is posted.
You are here: Home > Airline Travel > Con Air 2010 (TSA Remix)
@ladylordess They most certainly do not have a union, YET!!! Guess who is sniffing around them?? They are ripe for a greedy union who are in desperate need of new membership dues.
@ladylordess They don’t have a union
@tedm82 it’s on par with “Don’t taze me, bro”
This video idea is fuckin incredible GAH-DAM !! Kudos, ReasonTV !!
“If you touch my junk i’m gonna have you arrested” That made me queef
For men, one fingah
For weemen, TWO fingah…
For GrassHoppah… hang by dick naked in hotel closet
I haven’t heard from the San Fransicko crowd…..I suppose this is a free cheap thrill. Well, maybe the left coast politicos like Nasty Pillhozie and Barbara Schmoxer will weigh in …..then we can go to the 9th Circus court and ALL be entertained!
@ceoaalp Unions and the government are enslaving people while pretending to be FOR their rights. All they care about is political power and membership dues. They create nothing, therefore are nothing. Victim/Oppressor only occurs if the victim allows it to. Create something.
@ladylordess Its the global elite that are destroying America and the rest of the world. They want everyone to live under their tyranny and oppression. The DHS and TSA is just another one of their sick tools to domesticate people.
Very true. Sad but true.
Abolish the TSA. It is all about Unions!!! Unions are the destruction of America.
@blogegog
Here’s a clue, put some words in your own mouth. You continue to refuse to support your claim that ReasonTV promotes the “smoking of weed” and you also refuse to refute the claim that raw milk is healthy.
All I and a few others have done is identify you as a shill for outlawing healthy food and I have additionally accused you of knowingly lying about the motives and actions of ReasonTV. We name specific statements you made and point to their invalidity. All you do is bleat adhominem.
@maskedphrogg Thank you for putting words into my mouth and then complaining that those words were lies. you would make a great politician. For the DNC at least.
“if you touch my junk I am going to have you arrested”
The newest of Great battle cries in american history…
In retrospect you are unwilling to debate the topic with supporting evidence. In case you hadn’t noticed, there is a substantial volume of discussion here in YouTube and millions of posts that present evidence and debate the merits of arguments. I suggest you start being honest with yourself so you can then be honest in the arguments you make to others. You have made claims and now seem to think you can deny that discussion is even possible, we are to just accept your conclusions w/o debate.
@blogegog
You made an outright claim that ReasonTV promotes the *use* of marijuana. Couch it in whatever terms you want now, but that claim in and of itself brands you a liar. You seem to ignore the fact that their videos are here and available publicly. That you would so blatantly lie about that subject, ReasonTV promotes smoking weed, leads reasonable people to be suspicious of any other claims you make. Shill for outlawing healthy food all you want, not all will fall for your sham.
I’d like to see all the TSA employees who disagree with this policy of forced sexual assault opt out themselves – stay home sick on Wed. so you’re not at work groping innocent citizens.
@maskedphrogg I can’t present evidence in the youtube comment section, so just like yourself, I haven’t presented evidence. I can only hope to convince you to do some research. You know, read about milk-borne diseases. You seem unwilling to do that though. So be it.
For the record, your decision to drink milk in any form will have no effect upon my life, beneficial or detrimental.
@blogegog
You should open up the book _1984_ by George Orwell.
Like the “screens” that inundate the public squares in that book, you loudly make claims but never present supporting evidence. Is it because you can’t find the evidence or the more likely case that you know what you claim is false but you believe you stand to benefit from others relying on and giving vocal support also to your false claims.
@maskedphrogg You really need to google ‘listeria’. You’re spreading dangerous misinformation.
@myhipsi “I agree with you in the context of what you presented.”
No, you don’t.
“However, production for the purpose of selling for profit is a different animal”
Why? Why can’t the actors sell their time? The producers sell their product? Why must you make any distinction what so ever between “civil” and “commercial”?
Either someone is harmed, or they’re not. A murderer is no less a murderer because they didn’t do it for money.
@CurtHowland
I agree with you in the context of what you presented. I don’t think it’s even practical in this day and age, to have child-porn illegal per se. Since cell phone camera’s (sexting, etc.) are so prevelant amongst younger teens and preteens. Eventually, it’ll just be unenforcable, due to the shear amount of proliferation. However, production for the purpose of selling for profit is a different animal, and that’s what I was originally refering to.
@myhipsi Then the answer is to create a situation where consent can occur.
Why are cartoons of “child porn” illegal? Did the ink not consent?
Why is it ok for 23 year old actors to portray teenagers, but its suddenly illegal if those fake teen characters interact sexually?
While child-porn laws are rationalized on “cannot consent”, the fact is that they are based on arbitrary moral judgments by busybodies who want to force their views on everyone else at taxpayer expense.
@blogegog
Why do you purposely misinform readers here?
ReasonTV has *never* advocated the ingestion of marjuana (weed). They rightfully promote the idea of self-responsible action that includes the *decision* to smoke or otherwise use hemp based products. You don’t seem to know much about mass produced milk either. It’s the factory version of commercial milk, the stuff you find on retail chain grocers shelves, that is overly laden with harmful bacteria having removed the natural disinfectants.
Constitution = Reasonable search and seizures (We’re innocent until proven guilty!)
TSA = Unreasonable search and seizures (We’re guilty until proven innocent!)
@myhipsi This assumes that the child was somehow involved in the transaction between the seller and buyer. They were not. They were involved in the _production_ of the pornography, so a case can be made against the production. However the action of purchasing and selling is removed from the act of producing.
@TehBANN3D
No, there is a 3rd party affected. The child doesn’t have the capacity to consent to such an act, especially for the purposes of profit. So yes, there is indeed a victim.
Besides, your missing the point. The point was that freedom can only exist where the rights of the individual are protected.